Worker A vs Pratik Hosiery

dc.contributor.authorRights Education and Development Centre
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-02T12:02:48Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.descriptionWorker demanded equal bonus payment after which he was verbally terminated without stating any reason. On CITU's advice worker approached the labour commissioner for conciliation but the management did not participate. The dispute was transferred to the Labour Court, Coimbatore and the award stated reinstatement with 25% compensation. The management has approached the High Court.en_US
dc.description.abstractCase history, company's profile, worker's details, the resolution process for a dispute over worker's illegal termination from Pratik Hosiery.en_US
dc.description.dis“All content hosted in this archive has been obtained with prior permission and approval from the institutions, organisations, and individuals who have either published/produced or held these materials as part of their collections. These materials are meant for educational, research and for non-commercial use only.”en_US
dc.description.hostArchives of Indian Labour [V.V. Giri National Labour Institute (VVGNLI) - Association of Indian Labour Historians (AILH)]en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dans.nls.ac.in/handle/123456789/6280
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.page5en_US
dc.subjectIndividual Complainten_US
dc.subjectWagesen_US
dc.subjectBonusen_US
dc.subjectFailure of Conciliationen_US
dc.titleWorker A vs Pratik Hosieryen_US
dc.typeCase Summaryen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
Worker_A_vs_Pratik Hosiery.pdf
Size:
96.9 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:

Collections