Case 16: Avery Denison - Termination
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://dans.nls.ac.in/handle/123456789/5182
Browse
6 results
Search Results
Item Item Statement of Objections Filed by Avery Dennison Before Deputy Labour Commissioner and Conciliation Officer(2017-12-30) Alternate Law ForumThe management demanded that the dispute should be treated as closed in the interest of justice as the workers were contractual employees.Item Petition under Section 12 of the IDA before the Deputy Labour Commissioner , Division 2, Bangalore against Avery Dennison by the Garment and Textile Workers Union(2017-10-28) Alternate Law ForumUnion demanded regularization of employment for the workers at Avery Dennison.Item Statement of Objections from Adecco India before the Deputy Labour Commissioner and Conciliation Officer(2018-02-01) Alternate Law ForumThey argued that they are responsible for supplying workers and Avery Dennison was responsible for fixing contracts. They denied union's demands.Item Statement of Objections from Sri Udyog Enterprise for Garment and Textile Workers Union(2018-03-01) Alternate Law ForumThe management concluded that the union did not provide any evidence for their claim and it should not be forwarded.Item Rejoinder by the Union after Avery Dennison's Reply before the Deputy Labour Commissioner(2018-01-16) Alternate Law ForumUnion rejected management's objections and demanded that the workers' service should be regularised and issue was discussed in conciliation.